In the corporate landscape, there are cases of unethical behavior that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that question the values of an organization . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, falls squarely in the latter category — a tale of presumed malfeasance that not only taints the reputation of a lone supervisor but throws doubt over the enterprise’s integrity.

Despite a range of troubling accusations , Collins has remained in his role , visibly unaffected by the controversies swirling around him . How has this been tolerated? What does this say about the company’s commitment to responsibility ? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of inappropriate actions was initiated by breaking of the organization’s employment terms , but it didn’t end there . Instead, it transformed into a pattern of misconduct that has left colleagues jaded and partners bewildered .

While attending a professional growth course —ironically aimed at enhancing leadership qualities —David Collins allegedly turned what should have been a growth-oriented experience into a series of reckless events . Allegations indicate he spent business-funded trips pursuing romantic liaisons , a clear breach of Ventia’s organizational standards, all while his household stayed oblivious .

But the indiscretions didn’t cease at those affairs. One of the bigger revelations involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to women—a gross misappropriation of professional tools and a breakdown of professionalism . His reckless employment of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including symbols celebrating indiscretions—paints a picture of a man indifferent to the outcomes . Following these digital overtures , Collins allegedly intensified his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during working hours, despite his relationship status and her having a significant other. This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources contravened corporate etiquette but resulted in personal devastation — leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the workplace .

Why can this behavior be enabled to endure ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly breached every guideline is still receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, lies in a worrisome failure of governance within the firm . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins persists unabated.

This deficiency of accountability broadcasts an ominous signal : that here rank and influence within the enterprise can serve as a safeguard. It fosters a poisonous corporate culture , discourages team members, and ultimately compromises the organization’s integrity .